Dysport vs Botox | Everything You Need to Know
Dysport vs Botox. Which one is better? Before we delve into this question, you should first understand that both injectable products have been FDA-cleared to minimize the appearance of wrinkles by paralyzing temporarily certain facial muscles. Experts at the Longevity Aesthetics and Laser Spa use both treatments to smooth out the crow’s feet, frown lines between the brows, and forehead lines.
Dysport vs Botox – Their Difference Mainly Stems From Their Dosage
Both products use botulinum toxin type A to paralyze muscles responsible for the appearance of wrinkles and lines. Simply put, they are biologically and chemically similar that most doctors feel that the “best one” is just a matter of preference and experience with the product.
The only subtle differences between the two products involve their dilution and protein molecule size. Dysport is more diluted and has a smaller protein molecule compared to its more popular rival Botox.
Because Dysport has a lower concentration of protein, your immune response is less likely to over-react and block its activity. Hence, people who have developed resistance to Botox after years of use are often good candidates for this product.
Dysport Spreads A Bit More Than Botox
Dysport spreads a little more compared to Botox, which makes it ideal for treating larger areas such as the forehead lines and crow’s feet. However, smaller wrinkles such as the frown lines between the brows may fare better with Botox, which is generally ideal for areas that require more precision.
With greater diffusion, Dysport often entails fewer injections compared to Botox, which also means less discomfort.
Nonetheless, Botox remains ideal for treating smaller areas and facial regions with thicker muscle such as around your mouth.
Dysport vs Botox: Final Results
The results and longevity of Dysport and Botox are fairly the same. On average, they last three to four months, although the results often persist longer each time you receive injections since they shrink the target muscles.
Meanwhile, Dysport may have a slightly faster onset of action than Botox (one to two days versus five days), which makes the former more ideal if you have an upcoming event one to two days away.
Several studies have been conducted to determine whether Dysport or Botox provides a better outcome, with many of them giving mixed results. Hence, it is safe to surmise that your doctor’s skills and qualifications remain the most influential factor that determines the success of your treatment.
A good rule of thumb is to find a medically licensed injection specialist–e.g., dermatologist or plastic surgeon–who performs Dysport and Botox treatments on a regular basis. Take note that most states do not allow aestheticians and other non-medical professionals to perform injectable treatments.
Bottom Line Involving Dysport vs Botox
To reiterate the comparison of Dysport vs Botox, the final results are mostly influenced by the skills of your injector. Moreover, due to their almost similar results, the choice between Dysport and Botox boils down to the preference of both the patient and the provider. Some doctors even use both products simultaneously during a single treatment.
Occasionally, Dysport and Botox are complemented by dermal fillers, which are also referred to as volumizers because they correct soft tissue deflation (flat cheeks, thinning lips, etc.) caused by aging. Fillers can also fill in the laugh lines, tear trough, the hollowed lower lid.